|
| |
|
Report to Licensees
of the
LOUISIANA
BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
Volume 17, No. 1
December 2007
Season’s Greetings!
Board Members 2007-
08
Mica F. Landry, DVM,
President
William H. Green, DVM,
Vice-President
Brent D. Robbins, DVM,
Secretary-Treasurer
John C. Prejean, DVM,
Member
Patrick Bernard, DVM, Member
Table of Contents

|
|
20 Credit Hours of Continuing Education Required for Next Renewal Period
Final Rule 400, 403, 405, 409, 413 – Continuing
Veterinary Medicine Education – Effective April 20, 2007, Rule alters the
requirements and program approval of continuing veterinary medicine
education for annual renewal of veterinary medicine license, from 16
credit hours per year to 20 credit hours per year with an expansion in the
nature and substance of acceptable credit hours. Rule effective for the
period of time (July 1, 2007-June 30, 2008) for the 2008-2009 annual
license renewal and every annual license renewal period thereafter.
|
|
Top of page

|
|
Disciplinary Cases
Case No. 07-0116V – Based on the Consent Order, the
Board found that the respondent veterinarian was in violation of LSA RS
37:1526A(14) and Board rules, Title 46, Part LXXXV, Sec. 1001 et seq.,
Section 1023, 106, 1401, 1409C, and AVMA Principle VI.A of Principles of
Veterinary Medical Ethics in that the respondent was negligent in allowing
escape and/or to lose the client’s animal. Respondent was fined $250 and
ordered to pay the amount of cost recovery for the proceedings.
Case No. 06-0316.1V – Based on the Consent Order, the
Board found that the respondent veterinarian was in violation of LSA RS
37:1526A and Board rules, Title 46, Part LXXXV, Sec. 1001 et seq., Section
1023, 106, 1401,and 1409C, in that the respondent was negligent in failure
to tack down stomach of patient to abdominal wall during gastroplexy, and
failure to diagnose and provide referral to owners upon subsequent
presentation under facts of case. Respondent was fined $500, and ordered
to pay the amount of cost recovery for the proceeding.
Case No. 06-0306.3V – Based on the Consent Order, the
Board found that the respondent veterinarian was in violation of LSA RS
37:1526A and Board rules, Title 46, Part LXXXV, Sec. 1001 et seq., Section
1023, in that the respondent was negligent in unnecessarily vaccinating
for rabies and/or improperly treating with antibiotics/medications of a
cat. Respondent was fined $250, and ordered to pay the amount of cost
recovery for the proceeding.
|
|
Top of page

|
|
2008 Board Meeting
Dates
The Louisiana Board of Veterinary
Medicine will meet at 8:30 a.m. on the following dates: Thursday, February
7, April 3, June 5, August 7, October 2, and December 4, 2008.
|
|
Top of page

|
|
Rules Update – Please call
or write the Board office for a copy of any Notice of Intent or Rules
described below.
Final Rule 700, 701, 711 – Medical Record
Keeping, Mobile Practice Vehicle – Effective November 20, 2007. Rule
amended to more clearly define minimum standards for veterinary medical
record keeping, and clarifies the requirements for a veterinary mobile
practice vehicle.
|
|
Top of page

|
|
Rabies
Vaccination Time Lines
Mike Tomino, Board Legal Counsel
The Board has been asked the current state of the law
regarding rabies vaccinations and the time lines. More specifically, there
is a concern that the law has recently changed regarding this issue.
Pursuant to the LA Sanitary Code only a veterinarian can
vaccinate an animal for rabies prevention. However, as set forth in this
law, it is the obligation of the owner to have his animal timely
vaccinated. It is also the obligation for the owner to have his animal
timely vaccinated is mandatory. The controlling legal authority
establishes an annual vaccination, or an every three (3) year alternative
requirement, if applicable. The public policy behind this obligation is to
protect the public from rabies outbreaks.
It appears that the rules in the Sanitary Code have been
re-numbered in 2007, and perhaps better (more clearly) worded, but the
substance of the rule regarding 1 year vaccine or 3 year vaccine has not
changed. Bottom line, as per the newly numbered rule, is a series of 2
initial vaccinations is required. First, at 3 months of age, and second,
at the one year anniversary. However, if the animal is older than 3 months
when obtained, then the first vaccination is to be given then, with the
second at the one year anniversary date.
In addition, R.S. 40:1277, which deals specifically with
rabies control, requires the LA Department of Health and Hospitals to
enact the state sanitary code, including the authority of parishes and
municipalities to enact local ordinances, regarding the control of rabies
in animals. Therefore, certain legal authority is delegated to the
parishes and municipalities.
Since the requirement regarding the annual vaccination,
or every three (3) year alternative if applicable, is mandatory in the
Sanitary Code, it is the Board’s understanding that the governing
authority of a municipality or parish may not adopt a local ordinance
which alters this time line. In other words, the local authority
(municipality or parish) cannot increase or decrease the time line beyond
that set forth in the state law, for example to 6 months or 4 years. The
LA Veterinary Practice Act, and the Board’s Rules, do not address the
question other than to require that a veterinarian must follow all
federal, state, and local laws and regulations. With that said, given the
public policy behind rabies control, the Board must defer to the authority
delegated by law to your municipality and parish regarding the one or
three year time line established in the State Sanitary Code. It is
recommended that you contact the local health authority in the particular
parish or municipality in question, as well as the State Veterinarian’s
office or the State Sanitary Board, to determine which governmental
authority (state versus local) has preemptive jurisdiction if such remains
an issue. It is also suggested that the answer to your question be
obtained in writing so that you can document your file.
In concluding, the Board is of the opinion that it is
the professional licensee’s obligation to be knowledgeable of, and comply
with, applicable laws regarding the practice of veterinary medicine,
including local ordinance. While the Board makes every effort to educate
its licensees on issues and laws of general applicability across the
state, it is virtually impossible for the Board to keep abreast of every
parish and municipal ordinance enacted, or amended, which may affect the
practice, including local rabies control.
As always, should you have any questions or comments,
please do not hesitate to contact the Board office on the protocol to
submit your query. And, please do not be offended when you are requested
to submit the precise question(s) in writing so that not only will you
benefit from the written response, but your colleagues will as well.
|
|
Top of page

|
|
License Renewal Statistics 2007-2008
Active DVM –
1071
Inactive DVM –
219
RVT – 83
CAET – 105
RED - 5
|
|
Top of page

|
|
Reminder:
Maximum Hours for Preceptorship – The supervising
veterinarian at the preceptorship site should review carefully the
attendance sheet for the preceptee. Preceptees can only be credited for a
maximum of 9 hours per day, and 40 hours per week. If the preceptee works
beyond the maximum, (or under the minimum of 40/hours per week), he/she
will be required to repeat the preceptorship to fulfil the requirement
accordingly to Board rules. |
|
Top of page

|
| |
| |
|